Custom software for contractors: bid leveling, submittal and RFI logs, and the integration layer your platform won't build

No, and we'd argue against one. You've spent years getting your office and your field onto something, and swapping it moves the gaps rather than closing them. We build the layer around what you kept: the leveling sheet, the log, the joins to your ERP, the dashboard nobody sells. If the audit finds your platform already does something you're paying for and not using, the note says so.

When the work is genuinely yours. Bid leveling the way your estimator compares scope, a submittal board across every job in the shape your project executive reads, a dashboard that has to pull from the platform and the ERP at once. Those don't arrive as a feature request. Where a product already fits at a price you can live with, buy it, and we'll name it in the audit note instead of quoting you a build.

We won't claim that, because it isn't true, and a firm that oversells its integrations costs you a year. What we've built is the harder half: offline field records, vendor portals and compliance gating for TankAware and WorkMateAI, both running today. Procore's developer programme and marketplace, Buildertrend's API and the Sage, Foundation and Viewpoint routes are documented access models, and we confirm what your account exposes during the audit.

It moves records between systems that were never designed to talk, and it keeps a log of every touch. Bids, submittals, RFIs, cost codes, contracts and vendor documents each live somewhere already, and the layer reads and writes them to the depth your account allows. Where an API stops or a plan gates it, your office gets a reviewed queue it accepts with one click rather than retyping.

You do, and that's in the contract before we start. We work under NDA from the first conversation, and you get the first two months of support and maintenance free after launch. After that it's either an SLA with us or a trained handover to your own people. We don't build things that only we can keep running, because that's a hostage situation, not a partnership.

Yes. Your bid side is quoting up to several GCs rather than levelling subs, and your log side is chasing your own submittals through somebody else's portal. Both are the same shape of problem, and the portal retyping is usually the first thing worth building. We'd map it in the audit before scoping anything.

We won't give you a range before seeing the problem, because it would be a guess and you'd hold us to it. What we can tell you is the shape. The audit is free and takes one project and one month. The diagnostic gives you a fixed price rather than an estimate that moves. We build against your real projects and real data, and you can stop after any stage.